CONTRA ILEGAIS MONOPÓLIOS E RESTRIÇÕES À ATIVIDADE ECONÔMICA: A LEI SHERMAN DE 1890 | DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2018v73p173
Resumo
A Lei Sherman de 1890 é reconhecida como um dos grandes marcos do Direito Econômico. De acordo com essa importância, o artigo investiga os elementos que influenciaram a versão original da Lei Sherman, considerando as normas e institutos jurídicos que colaboraram para sua definição, bem como as principais inovações que ela ocasionou ao Direito dos EUA.
Downloads
Referências
ADAMS JR, C. A Chapter of Erie. The North American Review, vol. 109, No. 224 (Jul. 1869), pp. 30-106.
ADLER, E. Monopolizing at Common Law and under Section Two of the Lei Sherman. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 2 (Dec. 1917), pp. 246-270.
CHANDLER, A. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1962.
CLARK, J. The Limits of Competition. Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Mar., 1887), pp. 45-61.
COLLINS, D. Applied Antitrust Law. In: http://www.appliedantitrust.com/. Acesso em 10/08/2018.
COLLINS, W. Trusts and the Origins of Antitrust Legislation, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 2279 (2013)
CROSS, F., JACOBI, T., & TILLER, E. (2012). A Positive Political Theory of Rules and Standards. University of Illinois Law Review, 2012(1), 1-41.
DANA, W. "Monopoly" under the National Anti-trust Act. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 6 (Jan. 25, 1894), pp. 338-355.
DEMPSEY, P. The Rise and Fall of the Interstate Commerce Commission: The Tortuous Path From Regulation to Deregulation of America's Infrastructure, 95 Marq. L. Rev. 1151 (2012)
EATON, A. On Contracts in Restraint of Trade. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Oct. 15, 1890), pp. 128-137.
FINCH, J. Bills and Debates in Congress Relating to Trusts. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1902.
HADLEY, A. Private Monopolies and Public Rights. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Oct., 1886), pp. 28-44.
HEYDON, J. The Restraint of Trade Doctrine. London: Butterworts, 1971.
HOVENKAMP, H. Enterprise and American Law: 1836-1937. London: Harvard University Press, 1991.
HURVITZ, H. American Labor Law and the Doctrine of Entrepreneurial Property Rights: Boycotts, Courts, and the Juridical Reorientation of 1886-1895, 8 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 307 (1986).
KANAZAWA, M.; NOLI, R. The Origins of State Railroad Regulation: The Illinois Constitution. In: GOLDIN, G. e GARY, D. A Historical Approach to Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994 (p. 13 - 54).
LETWIN, W. The English Common Law Concerning Monopolies, 21 U. Chi. L. Rev. 355, 362 (1954).
LLOYD, H. The Story of a Great Monopoly. The Atlantic. March 1881. Disponível em: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1881/03/the-story-of-a-great-monopoly/306019/. Acesso em 10/08/2018.
MARSHALL, A. Some Aspects of Competition. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Dec. 1890), pp. 612-643.
MCQUILLIN, E. Validity of Contracts in Restraint of Trade. The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 33, No. 4, New Series Volume 24(Apr. 1885), pp. 217-230.
PERITZ, R. Competition Policy in America, 1888–1892: History, Rhetoric, Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
POUND, R. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1922.
SCHWARTZ, B. The Law in America. New York: McGraw-. Hill Book Co., 1974.
W.B.J. County Subscriptions to Railroad Corporations. The American Law Register (1852-1891), Vol. 20, No. 12, New Series Volume 11(Dec. 1872), pp. 737-745.
