O DEVIDO PROCESSO LEGAL PROCESSUAL NOS PRECEDENTES DA SUPREMA CORTE DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: UM CONTRIBUTO PARA A HISTÓRIA DAS GARANTIAS PROCESSUAIS | DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2018v72p187
Abstract
O presente trabalho reconstrói o histórico de formação da garantia do devido processoprocessual legal a partir dos precedentes da Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos. Além de
lançar luz sobre o período histórico de formação da garantia, que se transformaria no centro
de gravidade do processo civil contemporâneo, com elevada influência sobre a doutrina brasileira, pretende-se esclarecer que, apesar de sua importância, a garantia é vista, atualmente, como instrumental à proteção dos direitos materiais, devendo ser ponderada com outros valores relevantes que incidam sobre o caso.
References
BAYLES, Michael D. Procedural justice: allocating to individual. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
BERGER, Raoul. Law of the Land Reconsidered. In: Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 74, n. 1, 1979, p. 1-30.
BICKEL, Alexander. The least dangerous bench. 2nd ed. Binghamton: Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc., 1986.
CARNEIRO, Maria Francisca. Devido Processo Legal. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antonio Fabris, 1999.
CASTRO, Carlos Roberto Siqueira. O devido processo legal e os princípios da razoabilidade e da proporcionalidade. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2010.
COOLEY, Thomas McIntyre. A treatise on the constitutional limitations which rest upon the legislative power of the states of the American union. 7th edition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1903.
CORWIN, Edward S. The doctrine of due process of law before the civil war. In: Harvard Law Review, vol. 24, 1911, p. 366-385.
EASTERBROOK, Frank. Substance and due process. In: The Supreme Court Review, 1982, p. 85-125.
EBERLE, Edward J. Procedural due process: the original understanding. In: Constitutional Commentary, vol. 4, 1987, p. 339-362.
EDMONDSON, Paul W. Historic Preservation Regulation and Procedural Due Process. In: Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 9, 1978, p. 743-775.
ELY, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.
EPSTEIN, Richard A. Coniston Corp v Village of Hoffman Hills: How to Make Procedural Due Process Disappear. In: University of Chicago Law Review, n. 74, 2007, p. 1689-1703.
FRIENDLY, Henry. Some Kind of hearing. In: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, n. 123, 1975, p. 1267-1317.
FORKOSCH, Morris D. Brooklyn Law Review, vol. 24, 1978, p. 173-253.
GARNER, Bryan A. (ed.) Black’s Law Dictionary. 9. ed. St. Paul: Thomson Reuters, 2009.
HYMAN, Andrew. The little word due. In: Akron Law Review, vol. 38, 2005, p. 1-51.
JUROW, Keith. Untimely Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law. In: The American Journal of Legal History, vol. XIX, 1975, p. 265-279.
MARTEL, Letícia de Campos Velho. Devido processo legal substantivo: razão abstrata, função e características de aplicabilidade. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Lumen Juris, 2005.
MIXON, Donn. Procedural due process and the teacher. In: Arkansas Law Review, vol. 29, 1975, p. 87-103.
MOTT, Rodney L. Due process of law: a historical and analytical treatise of the principles and methods followed by the courts in the application of the concept of the “law of the land”. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merril Company Publishers, 1926.
MYKKELTVEDT, Roald Y. Procedural due process: the fair trial rule revisited. In: Mercer Law Review, vol. 24, 1973, p. 621-649.
NERY Jr., Nelson. Princípios do Processo Civil na Constituição Federal. 8. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2006.
PEREIRA, Ruitemberg Nunes. O princípio do devido processo legal substantivo. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Renovar, 2005.
PLATÃO. Apologia de Sócrates. Tradução de Maria Lacerda de Souza. Disponível em <http://www.dominiopublico.gov.br/download/texto/cv000065.pdf>.
REA, John C. Procedural Due Process in Parole Release Decisions. In: Arizona Law Review, vol. 18, 1976, p. 1023-1060.
RENDLEMAN, Doug. The new due process: rights and remedies. In: Kentucky Law Journal, vol. 63, 1975, p. 531-674.
ROSENTHAL, Lawrence. Does due process have an original meaning? On originalism, due process, procedural innovation...and parking tickets. In: Oklahoma Law Review, vol. 60, n. 1, 2007, p. 1-52.
SILVEIRA, Paulo Fernando. Devido processo legal. 3. ed. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2001.
STEVENS, Richard G. Frankfurter and due process. Lanham: United Press of America, 1987.
STEVENS, Richard G. Book review of W. Mendelson, Justices Black and Frankfurter: conflict in the court. In: William and Mary Law Review, vol. 3, 1961, p. 206-218.
TRIBE, Laurence e MATZ, Joshua. Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2014.
YOSHIKAWA, Eduardo Henrique de Oliveira. Origem e Evolução do Devido Processo Legal Substantivo: o Controle da Razoabilidade das Leis do Século XVII ao XXI. São Paulo: Editora Letras Jurídicas, 2007.
WASSERMAN, Rhonda. Procedural due process: a reference guide to the United States Constitution. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 2004.
WILLIAMS, Ryan C. The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause. In: Yale Law Journal, vol. 120, 2010, p. 408-512.
WOODSIDE, Frank C; SCHAEFER, Jeffrey R. The future of due process during discovery and what would Wigmore have to made of Daubert? In: "Due process be damned": 1995 annual meeting, The Fairmont, San Francisco, California. Manuscrito.
ZIMET, Barbara T. R. Ancient Athenian Procedural Due Process: A Reflection of Societal Values. In: The American University Law Review, vol. 23, 1973, p. 485-511.
